First disclaimer: The phrase “order out of chaos” (“ordo ab chao” in Latin) is often attributed to the 33rd Scottish Rite Masonry. This piece has nothing to do with them. I use the phrase because it resonates with my message, as you will see.
Second disclaimer: There is a beautiful quote attributed to Elizabeth Holmes, the disgraced founder of Theranos, a privately owned corporation once touted as a breakthrough health-tech company. It goes like this: “First they think you’re crazy, then they fight you, and then all of a sudden you change the world.” Upon closer inspection, it seems to be a paraphrase of the following statement, commonly misattributed to Mahatma Gandhi: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
In reality, this too is a rewording of a statement by Nicholas Klein, an American trade union activist speaking in 1918. Consider the statement: “First they ignore you. Then they ridicule you. And then they attack you and want to burn you. And then they build monuments to you.” I like all three versions because they correspond with my lived experience.
The third disclaimer relates to one of my own recent positions. In my piece titled “Why states fear complexity”, dated 14 September 2024, I pointed out that two forces — complexity and acceleration — were making societies too complicated to be governed by any state, resulting in the state’s woefully inadequate responses like repression, spin, propaganda and moral pollution. Then I wrote: “With such state-driven projects to subvert and pervert all arguments, moral pollution will only add to complexity… States’ reaction to this turf encroachment will not present a pretty sight.”
Then I suggested a remedy: “What can ordinary citizens do? The best disruption is the simplest — basic human decency. We can take charge of the future if all decent souls worldwide are vigilant. If you count yourself among them, wake up, be ready to use everything you have got, and watch this space.”
You are within your rights to complain that this is the context — where is the disclaimer? So here it is: I believe the simple remedy worked, and is still working.
Now to my core argument today, albeit with some context. In my past columns, I have repeatedly pointed out that in his book, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Samuel Huntington was being manipulative rather than prescient. With the luxury of 20/20 hindsight, one can say that his chief purpose was to divide and prime the world for a clash that could conveniently be weaponised and used by his favoured groups and entities.
I have also mentioned that while the direct impact of this sordid propaganda piece started to wane after the retirement of the Global War on Terror (GWOT) in 2017 — due to the emergent complexity of politics — two of its and GWOT’s key beneficiaries and committed Islamophobes (India and Israel) clung to it as if their lives depended on it. While nations are bigger than ideologies, their ruling elites often are not. Especially when their rise to power and influence can be directly linked to such a virulent ideology or philosophy.
Since the governments headed by Benjamin Netanyahu and Narendra Modi have repeatedly tried to reshape their respective countries’ internal political structures and the global rule-based order through a clever use of Islamophobia — with diminishing returns and capacity — they have been growing restless.
So, in the past sixty days, both nations initiated dangerous wars. India attacked Pakistan. Israel attacked Iran. Their sense of entitlement has been informed by their experiences spanning decades.
Since Kargil in 1999, India has felt that most of its claims are taken at face value. After 9/11, this trend was solidified. In 2016, it claimed the Uri incident was perpetrated by Pakistan-backed militants, against whom it had carried out a surgical strike. The world did not see any reason to dispute either claim. In 2019, on the cusp of a national election, it again blamed Pakistani militants and claimed to have carried out aerial strikes — again, without much proof. No disputes there either. The international media only questioned the claim about downing an F-16. This time, everything changed.
Likewise, Netanyahu did the same. Since the ghastly attacks of 7 October 2023, he has launched a forever war. Gaza, then Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen. But forever wars need superpower-level resources, which Israel lacks. So, his recent attack on Iran was an attempt to externalise the forever war by dragging the US into it. But through his cleverly calculated moves, President Trump demolished that attempt.
The question is: what changed?
The first reason: the law of diminishing returns. If you destroy the international rule-based system to such an extent that it can do nothing about your atrocities in Gaza or Kashmir, then the very order which rescued you repeatedly in the past can no longer come to your rescue. You got greedy and slew the golden goose.
The second reason is even simpler. It speaks to the nature of complexity I flagged earlier. While the inner workings of everything are getting complex, their end result is a simpler interface. For instance, you once needed knowledge and practice to code, make music, or create videos. Now you tell AI what you want and, with some refinement, it delivers results. The same goes for narratives. If you keep calling out propaganda, prejudice, and manipulations consistently and clearly, people begin to listen. Again, this is my lived experience. You need coherence and credibility, not sophisticated perception management. Just tell people what you hear and see. Since they can relate to your estimation of the objective truth, they pay attention.
Now the question is: where do we go from here? These two elements are down but not out. If they can be convinced that the age of spin and conspiracy is over, the world can take a beautiful turn.
But will they? Sadly, there are few signs that they will. In fact, they might want to hurt President Trump. In their diminished capacity, Indians are already trying to do that.
But Mr Trump is what Nassim Nicholas Taleb calls ‘antifragile’, growing with every attempt to undermine him. Perhaps after such outdated tactics are exhausted, they may discover a better world is possible: one where all prejudices — Islamophobia, Christianophobia, antisemitism, Hinduphobia — are equally repulsive, and we can all progress in harmony. Order out of chaos, perhaps!